Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Ohta-san, your email (retained as the first part of the below) is not in my view fair criticism against poor engineering results. it is a baldly and badly expresssed personal opinion.
FYI, on 2019/10/15 16:10, I wrote to this list: > Subject: Re: Sergeant-at-arms engagement model > Keith Moore wrote: > >> The words "They also include criticizing an idea in an insulting >> orexcessively hostile manner" are troubling. I realize that one >> maycriticize an idea in such a way as to effectively be critical of the >> person proposing the idea. And yet, it is essential that people be >> able to discuss ideas candidly, and sometimes to criticize >> ideasemphatically. I believe it's inappropriate to impugn a >> participant's motive without supporting evidence of that motive. But >> I don't believe it's wrong to point out any problem with an idea >> itself, nor with potential ill effects of an idea, nor even with the >> appearance of an idea. Sometimes this is a fine line, but it's >> essential that the SAAs not interfere with vigorous discussion of >> relevant ideas. > > Let me try. > > IPv6 with unnecessarily lengthy 16B addresses without valid > technical reasoning only to make network operations prohibitively > painful is a garbage protocol. > > LISP, which perform ID to locator mapping, which is best > performed by DNS, in a lot less scalable way than DNS > is a garbage protocol. > > Masataka Ohta but SAAs did not act against it. Masataka Ohta
