On 2/27/2021 6:57 PM, Ricardo Signes
wrote:
Thanks, this is a great point. I believe we must specify that the emoji provided in the reaction are not a string, but a set (or multiset, I suppose). Without this, the advice to drop individual illegal emoji candidates is dangerous!
And, indeed, the even-more-recent draft that will be submitted how has added to Section 2:
- Note:
- The part-content can first be parsed into candidate reactions, separated by wsp. Each candidate reaction that does not constitute a single emoji-sequence (as per [Emoji-Seq]) is invalid. Invalid candidates can be treated individually, rather than affecting the remainder of the part-content's processing . The remaining candidates form the set of reactions to be processed. This approach assumes use of a mechanism for emoji sequence validation that is not specified here.
d/
-- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
