On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 17:48 -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 2/25/2021 1:05 PM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: > > Speaking of whitespace, the grammar uses LWSP = *(WSP / CRLF WSP) > > This is IMHO at odds with "The content of this part is restricted to > > single line of emoji." Why allow CRLF if only a single line is > > allowed? Why restrict to a single line? > > Good catch. It should be WSP and not LWSP. Thanks! This has the added benefit that emojis are required to be whitespace separated (whereas LWSP has an empty expansion). Well, I call it a benefit because I think it gives a better hint about each emoji being a separate reaction, for MUAs which want to do tallies and summaries. -- venleg helsing, Kjetil T. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
