On 2/25/21 12:34, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 25 Feb 2021, at 19:29, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The considerations for these display elements need to be exactly as complex as the display considerations for Unicode in email bodies, and no more.
Then why does it not have the same characteristics as any mime body part with Unicode content?
It is exactly where the boundary is between code points that are allowed and not you have the key issues here.
The draft DO refer to very specific rules that are to be followed.
If it was not, I would not be as worried.
So you'd be okay if the document just removed the codepoint restrictions
and instead limited it to one line which is intended to convey a
pictographic reaction? That seems like a reasonable compromise, as it
would allow popular reactions like "¯\_(ツ)_/¯" and "(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻"
without needing a later revision.
/a
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
