On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:45:44PM -0700, Joseph Touch wrote: > > > > On Jul 25, 2020, at 1:40 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > For example, one could create a questionaire about language used in RFCs > > and pass that to all ISOC chapters for feedback, and then analyze that feedback. > > ISOC chapters have little to nothing to do with RFCs. What do you mean ? If i join an ISOC chapter, i am not allowed anymore to read RFCs ? Or have no opinions about what technical words would most likely be desirable for network engineers in my country (RFC text terms matching other educational material for example) ? Or whether avoiding specific words isin RFC would be seen as culturally benefical in my country ? The IETF community is not the customer (readers of RFCs), even though we are a subset of it. All i am saying is that if you change the product you should be interested to understand what the customer thinks. How would you propose to do that ? Cheers Toerless > They serve a different purpose, as described here: > https://www.internetsociety.org/chapters/ <https://www.internetsociety.org/chapters/> > Joe > -- --- tte@xxxxxxxxx
