Hi Alissa,
At 05:53 PM 14-07-2020, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Maybe the better path at this point would be for you to appeal
whichever actions I took that you find objectionable, that way I can
recuse from the process and the rest of the IESG can handle it.
Typically if people email me directly I assume they expect me to
respond, but if I'm recused that will take me out of the loop.
Thanks for explaining your position.
Ok. I think the chairs and I were just following typical practice.
Lots of the WGs chartered in the last year don't meet the criteria
you specify above:
The text which I cited is from BCP 25. It is up to the IESG to
determine which procedures are necessary to ensure openness and
fairness of the "process". If I understood correctly, the point
which you raised (thanks for providing the links) is that other IESG
members are not following the "Note Well".
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
