> In other words, does it matter that the only real public activity that > folks participate in with ICANN is to attack it. Yes it matters. That's the crux of the essense. Word for the day: "legitimacy". > Given that nearly all the folks dealing with ICANN seem inclined either > towards hyper-politics or hyper-criticism, what are the chances that 100% > transparency will cripple what little is left of ICANN's ability to get any > work done at all. (Hint: The answer is 100%) Bummer. -t