On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:27:26AM -0700, Mary Edie Meredith wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 10:11, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:42:18PM -0700, Mary Edie Meredith wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 16:11, Greg KH wrote: > > > ...snip > > > > So, if memory hotplug was the focus, why not call this out in your > > > > initial posting? Lumping other "hotplug" projects, all independant, > > > > together is very wrong, as I've stated numerous times in the past. > > > > > > Hotplug memory is just an example. I believe the issue that Andrew > > > raises might apply to the others as well. > > > > But it doesn't, as that code is pretty much already in the main kernel > > tree. A minor bit of research would have found that out. > > Greg, I am well aware that there is Hotplug code is in the kernel. How > could we do _regression testing if the code isn't in the kernel? Heh, good point :) So, what kind of regression testing do you all have planned for the in-kernel code? That would be quiet useful to have done and welcomed by the kernel community (but it's still not a justification to create a SIG just to work on regression tests...) thanks, greg k-h
