Hi, On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:27:54PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > >> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > >> > > >> > > Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert <path>" to mean > >> > > "revert the changes to <path>, relative to the index" (which > >> > > would be the same as "git checkout <path>"), then committing that > >> > > change just does not make sense. > >> > > > >> > > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert > >> > > <commit> <path>". > >> > > >> > Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. > >> > > >> > <gitte> Really, I wonder how difficult git is for people who are not > >> > brainwashed by cvs/svn, and unfortunately enough, partly by bzr > >> > and hg. > >> > <gitte> From a user perspective, you might be correct. But then we > >> > have to add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. > >> > <gitte> Not what I want. [06:46] > >> > > >> > I am wondering who said it ;-). > >> > >> Now, that is not fair, using my own words against me ;-) > > > > That's very funny actually :] > > Yeah, it was doubly funny after I saw you posted a list of "$scm revert" > and Dscho still sided with you in that thread. Hey, I had my nice 5 minutes for the day, so give me a break! ;-) Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
