Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:27:54PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> > >> > > Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert <path>" to mean "revert the >> > > changes to <path>, relative to the index" (which would be the same as "git >> > > checkout <path>"), then committing that change just does not make sense. >> > > >> > > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert <commit> >> > > <path>". >> > >> > Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. >> > >> > <gitte> Really, I wonder how difficult git is for people who are not >> > brainwashed by cvs/svn, and unfortunately enough, partly by bzr and hg. >> > <gitte> From a user perspective, you might be correct. But then we have to >> > add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. >> > <gitte> Not what I want. [06:46] >> > >> > I am wondering who said it ;-). >> >> Now, that is not fair, using my own words against me ;-) > > That's very funny actually :] Yeah, it was doubly funny after I saw you posted a list of "$scm revert" and Dscho still sided with you in that thread. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
