Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Allowing people to revert or cherry pick partially by using paths >> limiter is a very good idea; the whole "it comes from a commit so we >> also commit" feels an utter nonsense, though. > > No. > > When "git revert <commit>" commits the result, "git revert <commit> -- > <file>" should, too. I was not questioning about that part. "If 'git revert <some other form> foo' does not talk about commit, it should not commit" was what I was referring to. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
