Hi, On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > In the same way, I would expect "git revert <commit> -- file" to undo > > the changes in that commit to _that_ file (something like "git > > merge-file file <commit>:file <commit>^:file"), but this time commit > > it, since it was committed at one stage. > > Allowing people to revert or cherry pick partially by using paths > limiter is a very good idea; the whole "it comes from a commit so we > also commit" feels an utter nonsense, though. No. When "git revert <commit>" commits the result, "git revert <commit> -- <file>" should, too. You can always add the "-n" option. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
