Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert <path>" to mean "revert the > changes to <path>, relative to the index" (which would be the same as "git > checkout <path>"), then committing that change just does not make sense. > > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert <commit> > <path>". Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. <gitte> Really, I wonder how difficult git is for people who are not brainwashed by cvs/svn, and unfortunately enough, partly by bzr and hg. <gitte> From a user perspective, you might be correct. But then we have to add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. <gitte> Not what I want. [06:46] I am wondering who said it ;-). But anyway, I am inclined to agree that accepting "$scm revert paths.." as a synonym for "git checkout -- paths..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
