On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:27:54PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert <path>" to mean "revert the > > > changes to <path>, relative to the index" (which would be the same as "git > > > checkout <path>"), then committing that change just does not make sense. > > > > > > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert <commit> > > > <path>". > > > > Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. > > > > <gitte> Really, I wonder how difficult git is for people who are not > > brainwashed by cvs/svn, and unfortunately enough, partly by bzr and hg. > > <gitte> From a user perspective, you might be correct. But then we have to > > add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. > > <gitte> Not what I want. [06:46] > > > > I am wondering who said it ;-). > > Now, that is not fair, using my own words against me ;-) That's very funny actually :] -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpNLSvDqdLj0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
