On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:35:08PM -0800, Manish Singh <yosh@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> currently, and go beyond that with a full gtk and gimp binding. The
> same should be done for python (I have plans to do this) and perl, the
> idea being having languages besides C that can use the entire gimp API.
Hmm, at least during the 1.2 era, perl did have access to the full API
(i.e. low-level pixel access, full UI transparency etc.), and right now I
don't think something important has been added that is not accessible (as
opposed to parts that haven't been converted to the new API).
I mean, in the sense of "you can write plug-ins indistinguishable from
plug-ins wirtten in C", this was possible in perl for a long time already.
However, very few authors have used these features, and only two perl
plug-ins, both written by me, use their own Gtk-UI instead of relying on
Gimp::Fu, so I guess the demand for the latter power in perl is pretty
low.
(I might err and there are lots out there, perl developers have this
tendency of doing stuff for themselves without polishing & publishing
them...)
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxx |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
