On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 04:48, Sven Neumann wrote: > Well, it is not only used as a menu-path but also as a (short) > description. Basically, Script-Fu is a mess. Wouldn't you want to > rewrite it? We keep looking for someone who wants to redo Script-Fu > for quite a while already. Looking at that again, you are right (of course). The menu path shows up in the second line titled 'Blurb:' in DB Browser. This is good. I remember a long time ago when this wasn't there. I would find something in the browser I wanted to use but had trouble tracking down where it was in the menus. I do seem to have painted a target (or at least a sign) on my back as Script-Fu maintainer over the last number of days. :-) AFAIK, the Script-Fu stuff seems to be working. When you say you want someone to redo it, can you be more specific as to what you feel needs to be done to it? I might be able to start with small changes or patches to Script-Fu at first. However, GIMP itself and GTK+ have gotten a lot bigger and more complex over the years. I usually get lost following things in the GIMP the moment I hit a call to write_channel and the GTK+ documentation I have often found lacking. I'll try and track down some good GTK+ tutorials since I want to be able to do more GUI related programming in Linux. -- Cheers! Kevin. (http://www.interlog.com/~kcozens/) Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |"What are we going to do today, Borg?" E-mail:kcozens at interlog dot com|"Same thing we always do, Pinkutus: Packet:ve3syb@ve3yra.#con.on.ca.na| Try to assimilate the world!" #include <disclaimer/favourite> | -Pinkutus & the Borg
