Hi, Kevin Cozens <kcozens@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > In the file plug-ins/script-fu/script-fu-scripts.c is a typedef for > SFScript. The third member is 'description'. The contents of the > structure is filled in by the routine script_fu_add_script() further > down the file. This routine is processing the arguments of the > script-fu-register call located at the end of a Script-Fu based script. > It uses the second argument of script-fu-register to set the value of > 'description' in the SFScript structure. > > I see this as misleading. It is not a description of the script but more > of a menu path. The following item (referred to as 'help') contains more > in the way of an actual description of a script. > > I think it would make more sense to change 'description' to something > like 'menupath'. It would be more indicative of its actual use. Well, it is not only used as a menu-path but also as a (short) description. Basically, Script-Fu is a mess. Wouldn't you want to rewrite it? We keep looking for someone who wants to redo Script-Fu for quite a while already. Sven
