On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 19:17 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 06/11/2013 12:37 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > Installing to a freespace should be uncontroversial indeed it's the > > resize I was referring to and as afaik when you buy a set of hardware > > with windows installed it does not come with "freespace" available > > and we should only be "supporting" dealing with factory defaults but as > > Samuel points out earlier in the thread > > > The criteria specifically refers to installing to freespace, so other > than the single partition reference what is the problem? If the user > wants to install alongside a default windows install, they will either > have to resize the partitions on their own or risk letting the installer > resize it (if it will). I can kinda see Johann's point, which is that - since most dual boot installs will require a resize - if we don't 'support' resize, we're really not 'supporting' dual boot installs. He's not wrong. But overall, I think it's worthwhile having the criterion to ensure that, as cmurf said, we at least make sure we get the bootloader stuff right at release time. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
