On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:29 PM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:14 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11/10/2012 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> >>> I think there's still some host/guest confusion going on, possibly. >> >> >> I was refereeing to Fedora as an guest in vmware,vbox,hyperv not as an host >> which is in context with the criteria discussion about Fedora being >> installed along with other OS. >> >> I considered it important that Fedora works out of the box when deployed as >> an guest in available virtual solutions but other people seem to praise >> stallman and what not fixating on open being the only way and failing to >> understand that people will use what works for *them* and accept other >> alternatives... >> >> It's kinda obvious that we cover our ground to the best of our ability with >> Fedora as an host where applicable ( kvm/xen ) > > We should not differentiate between hardware platforms and virtual > machine environments i.e treat "running on a guest" the same as should ready "running as a guest" -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test