Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 17:21 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:24:54PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 11/09/2012 10:56 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > >Vbox and vmware require external kernel modules.
> > 
> > Can you please provide a link to where it says you need to install
> > "external kernel modules"
> 
> Somebody said so earlier in this thread and I took it for a face value.
> Maybe I misunderstood something?

I think there's still some host/guest confusion going on, possibly.

VBox does need out-of-tree kernel modules when run as a host on Linux.
Some Linux distros package these via kmods or dkms or whatever. I'm not
sure if RPMFusion packages them for Fedora. If your distro does not have
a packaged version of RPMFusion with the kernel modules included, you
have to use a little installer script that comes along with VBox to
install them.

When running as a guest in VBox, I don't believe Linux _needs_ any out
of tree kernel modules to function, though I think there may be optional
'guest drivers' like most virt systems have, to improve the efficiency
of graphics and networking and provide for file transfer and
clipboarding between host and guest and so on.

I think you are a bit off-base when you say "This detail alone
immediately limits an audience for these "solutions" to a rather narrow
circle", though, even considering the host case. It's not very difficult
to install the modules to use VBox as a host even on Fedora, and on
Windows, Mac or many other distros, you can install VBox with the usual
installer system, you don't have to manually fiddle about with the
kernel modules.

I know from experience on these lists and on the forums that many users
do it. I'd say VBox is probably the most popular virtualization
environment for the 'desktop enthusiast' user group, who use a simple
single-system virt system to test out OSes and distributions - a
completely different use case from the 'enterprise virt' user who is
running multiple machines on a dedicated host. As I mentioned up-thread,
many users cite VBox's ease of use and features like 3D passthrough as a
reason to use it over virt-manager/libvirt/kvm.

Just go to the Fedora or Ubuntu forums and look how many people ask for
help with, or mention in passing that they are using, VBox. It's quite a
lot. And rather a lot more than mention virt-manager.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux