On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 11:55 +0100, Chris Murphy wrote: > I actually don't understand the RHEL angle on this missing piece > either. What is the use case of installing RHEL along side Windows? > Really, enterprise users do this? They share a single disk with one > bootloader/manager taking over another? Seems risky to me. I'd think > best practices would be, at best, separate OS's on separate drives, in > the case of BIOS-MBR. For UEFI-GPT it's… different. One word: laptops. Few laptops can fit a second hard drive. And you quickly learn that in the real word you had better leave Windows installed so can get tech support, download new firmware, etc. So you resize it down to minimal and put your work OS on. And if you can't do it in a couple of tries then you will probably pick a distro that can pull it off.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
