On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:14 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/10/2012 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> I think there's still some host/guest confusion going on, possibly. > > > I was refereeing to Fedora as an guest in vmware,vbox,hyperv not as an host > which is in context with the criteria discussion about Fedora being > installed along with other OS. > > I considered it important that Fedora works out of the box when deployed as > an guest in available virtual solutions but other people seem to praise > stallman and what not fixating on open being the only way and failing to > understand that people will use what works for *them* and accept other > alternatives... > > It's kinda obvious that we cover our ground to the best of our ability with > Fedora as an host where applicable ( kvm/xen ) We should not differentiate between hardware platforms and virtual machine environments i.e treat "running on a guest" the same as running on "laptop foo baz". It is just a different platform. When we find bugs that hit any other criteria that are specific to some environment we should do the same as we do with hardware ... i.e ask ourselves "is this a common platform worth blocking for?" and decide based on that (like we do now for hardware specific bugs). -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
