On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:43:49 -0500, Michel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Michel Salim wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ville Skyttä > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> FYI, apart from some general common sense packaging guidelines, I > >>> wouldn't > >>> invest too much time into this at the moment. We're working on some > >>> changes > >>> to the bash completion dir structure and probably the mechanism with > >>> which > >>> individual completions are enabled upstream, it'll hopefully be included > >>> in > >>> not too distant future releases. > >>> > >> Ah, right. Thanks. > > > > Provided what Ville said, if I were you, let your package own > > /etc/bash_completion.d/ ;) > > > Indeed, that's what I did. Bugs filed against darcs > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012) and mercurial > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487015) as well. Which reminds me: Does anyone have a script to examine repo metadata for all dependencies on files/directories? Do we have any package in the collection that depends on a directory instead of a package name [to pull in a home directory e.g.]? -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
