Re: Packaging clarification regarding bash-completion scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
For those cases, 2 approaches exist:

1) let all packages which provide such a plugin own the directory, they install a plugin/add-on to (This is the approach, which is being applied for packaging perl-modules)

This approach, however is only functional when all packages providing such "plugins/add-ons" obey such a convention.

2) split out the plugin/add-on package into a separate package and let this spit-out package depend on the "base-package".

There is a third possible approach:

Split out the plugin dir into a separate package and let
plugin/add-on packages depend on it.

However, both approaches, are only fully functional when all packages providing such "plugins/add-ons" obey such conventions.

This stays true for all possible approaches.

Florian

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux