On Monday 23 February 2009, Michel Salim wrote: > One of my package, bti, now ships a bash-completion script, which > needs to be installed in /etc/bash_completion.d/ . It seems that the > expectation is that installing bash-completion should automagically > enable all applications that provide completion scripts, and so > existing packages should own /etc/bash_completion.d (rather than > depending on it). FYI, apart from some general common sense packaging guidelines, I wouldn't invest too much time into this at the moment. We're working on some changes to the bash completion dir structure and probably the mechanism with which individual completions are enabled upstream, it'll hopefully be included in not too distant future releases. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
