On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michel Salim wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> FYI, apart from some general common sense packaging guidelines, I >>> wouldn't >>> invest too much time into this at the moment. We're working on some >>> changes >>> to the bash completion dir structure and probably the mechanism with >>> which >>> individual completions are enabled upstream, it'll hopefully be included >>> in >>> not too distant future releases. >>> >> Ah, right. Thanks. > > Provided what Ville said, if I were you, let your package own > /etc/bash_completion.d/ ;) > Indeed, that's what I did. Bugs filed against darcs (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487012) and mercurial (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487015) as well. Regards, -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
