On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:22 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > And those "lazy" people (in quotes because there are also other reasons than > laziness) would otherwise end up with no updates at all, how is that better > than at least providing _some_ security fixes, even if not all gets fixed? No updates, as well as warnings from PackageKit et al that explains that the release has gone end of life is a heck of a lot different from a continued dribble of updates that /looks/ like the release is still in good support. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list