Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:22 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> And those "lazy" people (in quotes because there are also other reasons than 
> laziness) would otherwise end up with no updates at all, how is that better 
> than at least providing _some_ security fixes, even if not all gets fixed?

No updates, as well as warnings from PackageKit et al that explains that
the release has gone end of life is a heck of a lot different from a
continued dribble of updates that /looks/ like the release is still in
good support.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux