Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:01:53AM +0200, shmuel siegel wrote:
>>   
> Up to here you definitely had my sympathy. But this anarchical approach  
> makes me wonder who your target audience is. I would think that the  
> majority of people who wouldn't want to upgrade to an official Fedora  
> release would be people who need stability. Fedora itself  is probably a  
> little bit too unstable for them. These people would probably want more  
> than the average level of QA. To borrow a phrasing from Jef, legacy  
> updates should be edible by babies.

More QA in EOL than in release doesn't make sense. This 'anarchical'
approach is not very anarchical given what kind of changes are allowed.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux