Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



shmuel siegel <fedora <at> shmuelhome.mine.nu> writes:
>
> Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > More QA in EOL than in release doesn't make sense. This 'anarchical'
> > approach is not very anarchical given what kind of changes are allowed.
>
>  From a developer's point of view you are right. But I believe that the 
> majority of risk takers would upgrade before the end of life simply 
> because they want the newer stuff.

We're just being pragmatic. It doesn't make sense to demand more QA than we 
have the resources to provide, that is what ultimately made Fedora Legacy fail.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux