Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff <at> gmail.com> writes:
I don't think anyone would sign up as a user for such "support". LTS
is about a fairly specific promise that is very hard to commit to.
The users I have in mind wouldn't actively "sign up" for it, they'd end
up with it due to inaction, just as they currently end up with no updates
at all.
Catering to lazyness sounds misguided to me...
While I don't have much faith in Fedora to provide long term or even
short term stability, providing security fixes for bugs you shipped even
beyond the expected support time frame sounds like a very responsible
thing to do.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
