Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 18:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Thanks Jesse, for making it clear that you are more interested in
> confrontation than a constructive discussion impossible. 

I'm interested in fixing our comps files, since that's what is used by
our installer, our compose tools, our package tools such as yum, our
developers, our documentation, etc, etc...

I won't argue that it could use improvement.  I will however argue that
the way to improve it is to have dialog with those using it and
producing it, rather than deciding off project somewhere to just ignore
it or apply filtering/modification to it without consulting the project
at all.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux