Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:49 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> 
> It's not. Groups are a subset of the comps groups. I've done substantial
> user research, and I'm sorry to say fine grained categories _do not
> work_ with real users. None of the people in
> http://www.packagekit.org/pk-profiles.html could tell me what they
> expected to find in base-system/system-tools or base-system/admin-tools,
> or tell me the difference between them.

So your solution is to invent something else entirely, rather than
helping Fedora clean up its groupings definitions?  Really?  Nice.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux