On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 11:22 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > So your solution is to invent something else entirely, rather than > helping Fedora clean up its groupings definitions? Really? Nice. No. PK groups are made up _from_ the comps groups. There are just an order of magnitude less options, and it's a flat list rather than a tree. Comps supports optional, mandatory, suggested and the sort of power user stuff that I just don't want to support in PackageKit. For me to "clean up the groups" would be to rip out all optional groups, rip out most of the obscure categories and add lots of packages with lots of extra deps. I'm sure that's not what you want me to do with comps at all. If you want to actually help with this stuff, can I suggest you join the PackageKit mailing list and discuss there? Fedora isn't the only consumer of PackageKit, and I'm keen on working upstream on ideas and policies with other distros rather than just defending decisions made upstream that affect fedora. And just correcting you: this wasn't _my_ decision, this was the result of working with lots of other distros. Sarcasm doesn't help anybody. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
