Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard Hughes <hughsient <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Sure. PK groups are different to comps groups. There are tons of comps
> groups, and I wanted only a few that we can share between distros. There
> are other distros than fedora that will share these categories.

But those "tons of comps groups" need to be shown! For example PackageKit isn't 
showing the KDE Software Development group at all. We need that group shown 
(and as a group, not a metapackage).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux