Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 08:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> The PK argument used to be comps groups suck, are distro-specific,
> have no equivalent on some distros, so people should drop comps and
> contribute to pk hardcoded stuff instead.

Sure. PK groups are different to comps groups. There are tons of comps
groups, and I wanted only a few that we can share between distros. There
are other distros than fedora that will share these categories.

> NIH syndrom IMHO

NSFU (not suitable for us) actually.

Richard.


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux