On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 00:32 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > On 2007-10-31, 18:49 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I have suggested at least 2 technical solutions, none of which > > needs any changes to Anaconda: > > May add one more possible solution: what about dropping Base > X group from anaconda altogether and why not to treat it as > a library, which is required by another components (do we have > a group for glibc)? The problem is that its components *aren't* libraries. If they were, they'd be appropriately required by packages and thus automatically pulled in. So where do you propose putting those packages so that they get installed on the system? Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
