Christopher Aillon wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
My arguments have remained purely technical so far and please do point
out where I have expressed any hostility. It seems the other way
around to me.
I'm seeing it expressed in both directions, though you might not be
aware of it. For instance, complaining to me about how other people
suck and are accusing you of having various agendas is a form of
hostility toward the other people, and when you brought it up in the
direct mail to me which had no relation to my post, I'm reading it as:
"This idea seems great, but stop accusing me of stuff. Others were too.
If we suck, it's no wonder why". This immediately puts me on the
defensive as I'm wondering what I said to provoke this reaction from you.
I am sorry you took it that way. Reading the entire thread would make it
clear where I am coming from. I wasn't complaining to you btw. Just
explaining my perspective.
Again, you are a former Fedora Board member. Please find better places
to express your dissatisfaction(s). In other words, knock it off (not
just you). I'm tired of the bickering, and this is detracting from the
main point I was making:
We are looking to have a more neutral backend. This is good for both
KDE and GNOME.
This is good for the long term if it works out well. Meanwhile can we
please make it so that if the user unselects GNOME and selects KDE
explicitly in Fedora DVD image, the user gets KDM by default? I think
this is a very reasonable request to make. Please consider it.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
