On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:02:00PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > I sense we seemingly we have a basic divergence on the purpose of > testing. > > You seem to understand it as a "delay queue" for updates, giving some > people a chance to check packages and withdraw them when they feel they > need to. > > I understand "testing" as "auxiliary repo" taking candidate packages for > "updates", which generally should only be pushed by request, not "by > timeout" nor by "no receiving complaints". Even in that case they are meant to go to updates, and in that case should be, at some point < rawhide when rawhide becomes the next version. Having timeouts for pushing from testing to updates has been discussed in the past, if I recall well, and I think that auto-pushing was not accepted. However, and if I recall well, there could be some auto-pushing after a delay when there is enough positive 'karma' for a package (2 people approving the update if I recall well). -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
