On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:28 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:12:34 +0100 > Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The actual question behind this is: Are the EVRs of packages in > > testing supposed to be updates < testing < rawhide? > > > > I.e. are upgrades from testing to rawhide relevant? > > IMHO yes. Any package that could potentially go out for a release (if > it's in -testing, it could potentially go out) should have an nevra > that sorts lower than release+1. IMHO no. It renders the primary purpose of "testing" absurd: "testing" packages for "updates" (testing == volatile, scratch, ... irrelevant) What matters, is packages which are being pushed from "testing" to "updates" containing appropriate EVRS at the very moment they are being pushed. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
