Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-10-31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 09:47 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:37:12 +0100
> Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > That's what the -n.fc7.1 versioning scheme is for.  
> > Wrong again. It's one (broken) way to approach this.
> > 
> > If you really want to force release tags, better automatically assign
> > them to packages (then YOU have full control over them), instead of
> > trying to push people around with your personals visions,
> 
> We don't really care how you do your versioning, so long as your
> upgrade paths work,
The actual question behind this is: Are the EVRs of packages in testing
supposed to be updates < testing < rawhide?

I.e. are upgrades from testing to rawhide relevant?

Ralf


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux