On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:33:34 +0100 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It renders the primary purpose of "testing" absurd: "testing" packages > for "updates" (testing == volatile, scratch, ... irrelevant) > > What matters, is packages which are being pushed from "testing" to > "updates" containing appropriate EVRS at the very moment they are > being pushed. Do you often build a package for testing, find out it works, and then go and rebuild it /again/ with a proper nvr? A good nevra strategy across your branches should give you the freedom to use always good nevras for testing, so on the chance that one of your builds is good it can just be moved and you don't have to rebuild just to use a good nevra. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
