Re: Package EVR problems in Fedora 2007-10-31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:48:36 +0100
Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> No disagreement on this. But I really don't see what you gain by
> forcing EVRs to "updates < testing < rawhide" for "packages in
> testing".

That's simply because you're failing to consider that things which are
in testing have (high) potential to make it into stable.  It would be
better for maintainers to fix nevra issues while the build is still in
testing than to wait until it hits updates.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux