On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:18:58PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > No, not really, you can have a package that provide different binaries. > For example the samba package is mostly GPL software except for > pam_winbind and nss_winbind, which are not under the GPL. The "whole > package" does not mean much. It's the single binaries+libraries that > count. Indeed single binaries and libraries may be under other licenses, but the src.rpm is GPL. > I can very well see us distributing something like, let's say Xorg, with > a little GPLed GUI in the same package, this does not make the whole > package GPLed. If it is a single .src.rpm, it does. Now, as you said above, if the GPL part can be put in a subpackage, then the remaining subpackages could be under another license. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
