On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 10:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Rex Dieter wrote: > > >> Yuck (again), my simple-minded non-lawyer common sense tells me such > >> items shouldn't be using the GPL then, but that's just me. > > > The Red Hat logos are not under GPL. The package license of the two > > relevant packages and the EULA makes this clear. > > Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single) > package is bad form. No, there are countless packages with differently licensed files in them. GPL+LGPL, GPL+(new)BSD, GPL+MIT, MIT+BSD, and on and on and on... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
