Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> Firefox isn't GPL'd. The GPL gives us the right to modify and >> redistribute without limitation. > > Firefox *is* under GPL. The whole codebase is trilicensed under > MPL/GPL/LGPL. Interesting, only the MPL is mentioned on: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/licensing.html but digging deeper I find: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html happy days indeed. > >The license of a software has zero effects on the usage of > a logo which maybe protected by a trademark. Yuck, murky waters. I figured if an icon/logo was included within GPL sources, and the GPL allows for unrestricted modification/redistribution, we were golden. Note, we're not talking about modifying the *trademarked* item in this case (which I would agree not a good idea), only using/displaying it. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
