Nicu Buculei wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> Yuck, murky waters. I figured if an icon/logo was included within GPL >> sources, and the GPL allows for unrestricted modification/redistribution, >> we were golden. Note, we're not talking about modifying the >> *trademarked* item in this case (which I would agree not a good idea), >> only using/displaying it. > Is not like that, consider the Red Hat icons/logos included in the GPL > RHEL sources, a derivative distro is required to change them. Yuck (again), my simple-minded non-lawyer common sense tells me such items shouldn't be using the GPL then, but that's just me. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
