On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:30:08AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single) > > package is bad form. > > No, there are countless packages with differently licensed files in > them. GPL+LGPL, GPL+(new)BSD, GPL+MIT, MIT+BSD, and on and on and on... In those cases the whole package is under the GPL (and, arguably MIT/BSD are almost the same). When there are other mixes it may be less clear. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
