Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> Yuck (again), my simple-minded non-lawyer common sense tells me such >> items shouldn't be using the GPL then, but that's just me. > The Red Hat logos are not under GPL. The package license of the two > relevant packages and the EULA makes this clear. Thanks, though I'd argue mixing-n-matching licenses within a (single) package is bad form. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
