Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> said: >> We may also want to start having a conversation about moving to >> x86_64-v2 RPM arch for x86_64 across the board if we're going to start >> encountering stuff like this. > > Is there a good decoder ring for which CPUs are which level? Looking at > all my systems, I think they're all at least v2 (I think only one v4 so > far). For example IIRC the last time this came up, there were still > Atom variants being sold that were not v2 compatible. Running /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --help is one way to see what's supported. That's simpler than parsing things out of /proc/cpuinfo, for me anyway. -- Todd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
