Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> It isn't as simple as changing the CFLAGS. QEMU used to check for
> the CPU feature at startup, set a flag, and then later use that flag
> to choose different codepaths, but this logic was removed. Avoiding
> the flag check in hot-paths makes a perf difference.
> 
> So we would have to revert the whole patch series in Fedora. That's
> doable today, but I'm not confident carrying a local only revert over
> time.

But it is the ONLY approach that is compatible with Fedora policies, and as 
such should be required. ESPECIALLY for a package like QEMU that many people 
are using.

If forward-porting the reverts stops being doable, then we will have to keep 
the old version of QEMU or fork the project.

        Kevin Kofler
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux